Recipes

Read from 1418 brews with flow data · 41 low confidence · 10 with notes only

  • Bloom
  • Fast pour (likely high agitation)
  • Slow pour (likely low agitation)
  • Swirl or shake
  • First bloom
  • Second bloom
  • Pour at a steady rate (flow-controlling dripper)

Your recipes

  • Shoebox QC (Washed)

    0:002:35
    30s bloom + 3-4 fast pours · ~1:16.7 or 18
    1. 0:00 bloom (fast pour, high agitation)
    2. 0:30 pour (fast pour, high agitation)
    3. Low pour (fast pour, high agitation)
    4. Low pour (fast pour, high agitation)
    91°C · 4 or 5 equal yeets
    Most brews took 2:25–3:15
    112 from notes · 129 look like it · 92 modified · avg 6.9
  • Bean's Beans Standard

    0:002:51
    Two 20–30s blooms + 1 fast pour + 1 slow pour · swirl after bloom, swirl after pour 4 · ~1:16.7
    1. 0:00 bloom (fast pour, high agitation), swirl
    2. 0:20 bloom (fast pour, high agitation)
    3. 0:40 pour (fast pour, high agitation)
    4. Low pour (slow pour, low agitation, melodrip), swirl
    91°C · 2 yeet blooms, 1 yeet pour, 1 low ag
    Most brews took 2:28–3:15
    78 from notes · 207 look like it · 15 modified · avg 7.0
  • Standard 3 Pour

    0:003:00
    30–60s bloom + 2 slow pours · ~1:15, 16.7 or 18
    1. 0:00 bloom (slow pour, medium agitation)
    2. 0:30 pour (slow pour, medium agitation)
    3. 1:43 pour (slow pour, medium agitation)
    92°C · 3 pours
    Most brews took 2:36–3:15
    0 from notes · 104 look like it · 32 modified · avg 7.8
  • Bean's Beans Joocy

    0:002:25
    Two 20–30s blooms + 1 fast pour + 2 slow pours · swirl after bloom, swirl after pour 5 · ~1:15.5
    1. 0:00 bloom (fast pour, high agitation), swirl
    2. 0:20 bloom (fast pour, high agitation)
    3. 0:40 pour (fast pour, high agitation)
    4. Low pour (slow pour, low agitation, melodrip)
    5. Low pour (slow pour, low agitation, melodrip), swirl
    91°C · 2 yeet blooms, 1 yeet pour, 2 low ag
    Most brews took 2:15–2:40
    78 from notes · 26 look like it · 13 modified · avg 7.5
  • Double Yeet Bloom 3 Pour

    0:002:24
    Two 20–30s blooms + 1 slow pour · swirl after bloom, swirl after pour 3 · ~1:16.7 or 18
    1. 0:00 bloom (fast pour, high agitation), swirl
    2. 0:20 bloom (fast pour, high agitation)
    3. 0:40 pour (slow pour, low agitation, melodrip), swirl
    91°C · 2 yeet blooms, 1 long pour
    Most brews took 2:15–2:51
    8 from notes · 13 look like it · 83 modified · avg 6.9

    Showing 10 of 104.

    • 2026-11-04 Mr. Tadese Teko 8 CT62
      looks like Double Yeet Bloom 3 Pour
      Two 30s blooms + 1 slow pour · swirl after bloom, swirl after pour 3 · ~1:16.7 · 2:25 total · Cafec Abaca
    • 2026-11-04 Mr. Tadese Teko 7 CT62
      looks like Double Yeet Bloom 3 Pour (modified: 88°C vs 91°C)
      Two 30s blooms + 1 slow pour · swirl after bloom, swirl after pour 3 · ~1:16.7 · 2:38 total · Cafec Abaca
    • 2026-11-02 XX6 - San Jerónimo Miramar 7 CT62
      Double Yeet Bloom 3 Pour · 1:46 total vs 2:24
      Two 20s blooms + 1 slow pour · swirl after bloom · ~1:16.3 · 1:46 total · Cafec Abaca
    • 2026-10-31 Takesi Geisha 2026 9 CT62
      looks like Double Yeet Bloom 3 Pour
      Two 20s blooms + 1 slow pour · swirl after bloom · ~1:16.7 · 2:13 total · Cafec Abaca
    • 2026-10-31 Takesi Geisha 2026 8.5 CT62
      looks like Double Yeet Bloom 3 Pour
      Two 20s blooms + 1 slow pour · swirl after bloom · ~1:16.7 · 2:05 total · Cafec Abaca
    • 2026-10-30 030 - San Jerónimo Miramar 7 CT62
      looks like Double Yeet Bloom 3 Pour (modified: 88°C vs 91°C)
      Two 30s blooms + 1 slow pour · swirl after bloom · ~1:17.1 · 2:25 total · Cafec Abaca
    • 2026-10-30 030 - San Jerónimo Miramar 7 CT62
      looks like Double Yeet Bloom 3 Pour (modified: 88°C vs 91°C)
      30s bloom + 1 fast pour + 1 slow pour · swirl after bloom, swirl after pour 3 · ~1:16.8 · 2:16 total · Cafec Abaca
    • 2026-10-28 XX6 - San Jerónimo Miramar 5 CT62
      Double Yeet Bloom 3 Pour
      Two 20s blooms + 1 slow pour · swirl after bloom, swirl after pour 3 · ~1:16.8 · 2:15 total · Cafec Abaca
    • 2026-10-28 XX6 - San Jerónimo Miramar 5 CT62
      Double Yeet Bloom 3 Pour
      Two 20s blooms + 1 slow pour · swirl after bloom, swirl after pour 3 · ~1:16.6 · 2:08 total · Cafec Abaca
    • 2026-10-28 XX6 - San Jerónimo Miramar 7 CT62
      Double Yeet Bloom 3 Pour
      Two 20s blooms + 1 slow pour · swirl after bloom, swirl after pour 3 · ~1:16.8 · 2:12 total · Cafec Abaca
  • Bean's Beans Floral

    0:003:00
    Two 20–30s blooms + 1 fast pour + 1 slow pour · swirl after bloom, swirl after pour 4 · ~1:18
    1. 0:00 bloom (fast pour, high agitation), swirl
    2. 0:20 bloom (fast pour, high agitation)
    3. 0:40 pour (fast pour, high agitation)
    4. Low pour (slow pour, low agitation, melodrip), swirl
    91°C · 2 yeet blooms, 1 yeet, 1 long/low ag
    Most brews took 2:27–3:15
    79 from notes · 17 look like it · 1 modified · avg 7.7
  • Standard 5 Pour

    0:003:35
    30–60s bloom + 4 slow pours · ~1:15, 16.7 or 18
    1. 0:00 bloom (slow pour, medium agitation)
    2. 0:30 pour (slow pour, medium agitation)
    3. 1:26 pour (slow pour, medium agitation)
    4. 2:00 pour (slow pour, medium agitation)
    5. 2:43 pour (slow pour, medium agitation)
    92°C · 5 equal pours, medium agitation
    Most brews took 2:25–3:36
    11 from notes · 53 look like it · 28 modified · avg 7.1
  • Shoebox QC (Natural)

    0:002:35
    30s bloom + 3-4 fast pours · ~1:15.3
    1. 0:00 bloom (fast pour, high agitation)
    2. 0:30 pour (fast pour, high agitation)
    3. Low pour (fast pour, high agitation)
    4. Low pour (fast pour, high agitation)
    85°C · 4 or 5 equal yeets
    Most brews took 2:00–2:48
    18 from notes · 11 look like it · 18 modified · avg 7.7
  • Lance Hedrick 2 Pour

    0:002:17
    30–60s bloom + 1 slow pour · ~1:16
    1. 0:00 bloom (slow pour, medium agitation)
    2. 0:30 pour (slow pour, medium agitation)
    90°C · 1 bloom, 1 long pour. Moderate ag.
    Most brews took 2:00–2:30
    4 from notes · 24 look like it · 18 modified · avg 6.6
  • Gabi Standard (bloom)

    0:004:05
    40s bloom + 1-3 pours · ~1:18 · any pour speed · on Gabi Master A
    1. 0:00 bloom (low agitation)
    2. 0:40 pour (low agitation)
    3. Low pour (low agitation)
    4. Low pour (low agitation)
    92°C · 60g bloom for 40 seconds, split rest
    Gabi Master A controls the flow: pour amounts, pour count and speed don't matter.
    Most brews took 4:10–4:20
    1 from notes · 32 look like it · 1 modified · avg 7.5
  • Gabi Gentle (bloom)

    0:004:05
    40s bloom + 1-3 pours · ~1:16.7 · any pour speed · on Gabi Master A
    1. 0:00 bloom (low agitation)
    2. 0:40 pour (low agitation)
    3. Low pour (low agitation)
    92°C · From H&S Gabi Gentle recipe
    Gabi Master A controls the flow: pour amounts, pour count and speed don't matter.
    Most brews took 4:00–4:24
    0 from notes · 30 look like it · 0 modified · avg 7.4
  • Lume 3 Pour

    0:002:08
    60s bloom + 2 fast pours · swirl after pour 3 · ~1:16.7
    1. 0:00 bloom (slow pour, medium agitation)
    2. 1:00 pour (fast pour, high agitation)
    3. 1:29 pour (fast pour, high agitation), swirl
    90°C · From Lume's recipe
    Most brews took 2:05–3:15
    0 from notes · 1 look like it · 19 modified · avg 6.6
Built with help from Claude Code, an AI coding assistant How AI was used Contact

How this site was built

I built Bean Tracker with Claude Code, Anthropic's AI coding assistant. Here's who does what.

What I do

  • Set the direction: which features get built, and in what order
  • Drive the technical decisions, drawing on my experience as a Staff SRE, DevOps engineer, and software engineer: architecture, hosting, testing, and releases
  • Bring nearly all of the coffee knowledge, from recipes, gear, and pour structure to extraction, rest, and water
  • Shape every design: I review each spec and push back on layout, wording, and behavior until it's right
  • Test every change in a live preview, on desktop and on my phone
  • Set the engineering standards: tests at every screen size, shareable links for every view, signed commits, and staged releases
  • Own the data: every coffee, rating, and note, plus the judgment calls on it
  • Run the infrastructure the site lives on: hosting, domains, and backups
  • Act as project manager and technical lead, and decide what gets published, including this note

What Claude Code does

  • Writes nearly all of the code and automated tests, following my direction
  • Drafts the designs, specs, plans, and docs for me to review
  • Researches options and explains the tradeoffs so I can decide
  • Analyzes my brewing data to suggest values, which I confirm or change
  • Releases and deploys changes once I give the go-ahead
  • Often runs several AI agents at once: one builds while another reviews

Nothing ships without my sign-off. I review every change in a live preview, and automated tests plus a separate AI code review check the code itself.

Questions or concerns?

If you have a question, spot a mistake, or want something removed (for instance, a photo of your coffee's label), email me at [email protected].

v1.110.7 Last updated: Last deployed: